For all of these improvements, there was still no way to capture the camera obscura's image other than by manually tracing it. There it was, tantalizingly projected onto a wall or a pane of frosted glass. You could look at it; you could reach out and touch it. But capturing the actual image was as impossible as capturing one's own shadow. It would remain so for another 75 years...until the invention of film.
SPIRITS IN THE MATERIAL WORLD
In 1674 an alchemist named Christoph Adolph Balduin performed a chemistry experiment that he hoped would help him isolate the mysterious natural force he called the "universal spirit." He dissolved some chalk (calcium carbonate) in nitric acid to create a sludgy substance that would easily absorb moisture from the atmosphere. Balduin believed that if he could distill the moisture from the sludge, he would capture the universal spirit in pure form.
Balduin did not know much about chemistry, and not many 17th-century alchemists did. When he distilled the sludge, all he got was water. However, he noticed that when he heated the dried-out crud that was left over, it glowed in the dark. He named this mysterious substance phosphorus, Greek for "bringer of light," (today it is called calcium nitrate).
What did this have to do with photography? Nothing... until a German anatomy professor named Johann Heinrich Schulze tried to repeat Balduin's experiment in 1727. By chance he used nitric acid that contained traces of silver. He left the chalk-acid mixture out in the sun; by the time he came back to it, it had turned a deep purple.
MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE
Schulze was not the first person to observe that substances containing silver salts turn dark when exposed to the sun.
However, it had always been assumed the reaction was caused by the heat. Schulze suspected that light was to blame and came up with an experiment to test his theory: He cut a stencil of some words on a piece of paper. He put the stencil on the side of a glass bottle and covered the rest of the glass with dark material. He filled the bottle with the chalk dissolved in nitric acid and left it out in the sun, to see if the sunlight would "write" the stenciled words onto the material.
"It was not long," he wrote later, "before the sun's rays, where they hit the glass through the cut-out parts of the paper, wrote each word on the chalk precipitate so exactly and distinctly that many who were curious about the experiment took occasion to attribute the thing to some sort of trick." In a nod to Balduin, Schulze called the material scotophorus, or "bringer of darkness."
Schulze did not understand why the substance turned dark, but today we do: When light strikes photosensitive silver crystals, some of the atoms of silver separate out from the compound. Exactly how many atoms separate depends on how much light strikes the material. With enough light, however, the silver will become visible to the naked eye, and the material becomes dark. This is the chemical principle upon which all film photography would be based.
Schulze could not figure out how to control the reaction—the silver salts darkened every time they were exposed to light, obliterating whatever writing or image had been created. As far as he could tell, the material had no use, but it was still interesting, and as word of his discovery spread, scientists all over Europe repeated the experiment.
Next Week ; PAPERWORK , FIXING THE PROBLEM , THE NEXT LEVEL